8/21/11

Liberals, Evangelicals, and the Offense of "Ecclesiospel"

OK, bear with me here and suffer this exegete a little indulgence.

The question I want to put forth is whether, biblically, we can say that in a certain sense the gospel = the church. Mark says of the beginning of Jesus’ public ministry that he began to "preach the gospel of God, saying, 'The kingdom of God is at hand. Repent and believe the gospel.'" Then immediately following this passage we see the calling of Jesus’ disciples, whom he eventually named apostles.

Now it has been fashionable in liberal circles to insist that while Jesus promised a kingdom, what we ended up getting was a church, and that the project of the NT writers was to try to do a bit of damage control by shoehorning the idea of the church back into the words of Christ in order to show that Jesus really meant “church” when he said “kingdom” (even though he really didn’t).

But when we come to realize that placing the calling of the Twelve immediately following the announcement of the kingdom was no accident, and that it is by the apostles’ serving at the Lord’s Table that they will rule Jesus’ kingdom as those sitting upon thrones and judging the twelve tribes of the new Israel, then we will have to abandon forever the idea that the church and the kingdom are two antithetical things. In fact, we will be forced to admit (with the Westminster Confession) that the visible church is the kingdom of God as it is manifested in this present age.

But how does the gospel fit into all this?

First, note that "gospel" bookends "kingdom" in Jesus’ initial proclamation (Jesus proclaims the gospel saying that the kingdom has arrived, and that people should believe the gospel). Moreover, consider how closely Paul’s message resembles that of Jesus. In Ephesians 3 the apostle goes on and on about his calling to proclaim what he calls “the mystery,” and finally in v. 6 he tells us what the mystery is: the mystery is that God is calling into existence a new body whose members consist of Gentiles as well as Jews, and whose Head is Christ. In other words, the mystery is the church, which is the body of Christ. But then at the end of the epistle Paul asks for prayer that he may be given divine boldness to preach what he calls “the mystery of the gospel” (6:19).

When we connect the biblical dots we discover—much to the chagrin of mainline liberalism—that not only are the kingdom and the church not at odds, they are in fact intimately related. And further, when we connect the biblical dots we also find—much to the chagrin of mainstream evangelicalism—that not only are the gospel and the church not at odds, but they are in fact virtually one and the same thing.

10 comments:

  1. This is good food for thought. This would put us at odds not only with liberal theology, but also with Ridderbos, wouldn't it? I'm taking Gospels this coming semester; I'll have to think about this as I do so.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jason,

    What do you think of the Catholic Church's belief that the Church is the Kingdom "in seed form"?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jamie: Could you be more specific about Ridderbos?

    Devin: I can live with that. I think a good way to put it is this: The kingdom of God is fully present when God's holy people are ruled in God's holy land by God's holy king.

    Thus the closest we have come to seeing such a thing on earth is under Solomon's reign, but of course, all that was but a type of the real thing. In the new heavens and earth the kingdom will be fully realized, while in this age it manifests itself under the shroud of the cross and in a form considered weak and foolish by the world.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So then does that mean "the church" is like a mustard seed, leaven & a field of wheat?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Theonomist,

    It means that the church will grow from something small (mustard seed/leaven) to something larger (mustard plant/bread or leavened dough). It also means that the church will be a mixed community of the elect and non-elect (field of wheat [and tares]).

    ReplyDelete
  6. Pastor Stellman

    I think you could use I Cor 15:24 to bolster your claim.

    1 Cor 15:24 Then comes the end, when He delivers the kingdom to God the Father, when He puts an end to all rule and all authority and power.

    Dean B
    NKJV

    ReplyDelete
  7. I read "The Coming of the Kingdom" this summer, but have returned it to the library now so I can't give an exact quote. But I remember him arguing pretty strongly that the kingdom should not be equated with the church. Sorry I can't be more specific right now.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What do we do with WCF XX.ii:

    The visible Church . . . is the kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ, the house and family of God, out of which there is no ordinary possibility of salvation.

    This sure seems to equate church and kingdom.

    ReplyDelete