I preached last Sunday morning on John's account of Mary's encounter with the risen Christ in which her attempts to demonstrate genuine affection and surprise upon seeing Jesus alive were seemingly rebuffed with a curt rebuke: "Do not cling to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father" (Jesus' seeming annoyance notwithstanding, I resisted the temptation to title the sermon "Mary, Mary! Why Ya Buggin'?").What strikes me about this exchange is that the obvious difference between the pre- and post-ascension relationship of Jesus with his followers seems to be one that suggests less intimacy, when in fact the opposite is the case. We know this by what Jesus said next: "Go to my brothers and tell them that I am ascending to my Father and your Father." If anything, the physical absence of Christ creates a relationship that is more intimate, not less.
If you had asked me a few years ago whether a study of the gospels would really yield any new insights for me, I would have dutifully answered "yes," but the things I would have had in mind would have been mostly factual (such as becoming familiar with this or that Jewish custom, or learning how many days' journey it was from Jerusalem to Galilee). But I must say, the things I have been learning and passing along have been every bit as mind-blowing for me as they have been for many members of my congregation. So despite how basic and fundamental it sounds, it really is incredible that Jesus ascended to the Father with our human nature, that humanity is now part of the Godhead, and that when the Trinity gathers, our flesh is present there as the glorified firstfruits of things to come.
Considering Christ's heavenly advocacy through the lens of the historia salutis takes things to a whole new level, and it makes me wonder why the ascension doesn't get more press in Reformed circles (although Horton's People and Place, building upon Douglas Farrow's work, is a welcome addition). I'll leave you with a quotation I cited in my sermon:
"[The ascension of Christ] is an act that, having overcome sin and death, results in a time and place and mode of life defined by full participation in the trinitarian economy. For in and through the ascension of Jesus the earthly things of human existence (whether physical or mental) are so united with the heavenly things of the Spirit that the former are made fully subject to the goal of communion with the Father." Douglas Farrow, Ascension Theology, p. 48

Thanks Jason. This goes well with Paul's discussion in Colossians three, and what Hebrews says about Jesus calling us brothers. Wonderful.
ReplyDeleteRichard
I agree, wonderful. Thanks for continuing to edify -- and always with such conciseness! (Concision?)
ReplyDeleteFor those that don't have time to read whole books, this Horton article is very helpful on re-emphasizing the Ascension.
RubeRad
I have a frustrating time with my Pentacostal and evangelical friends who continually pronounce living in the Spirit and rejecting anything of the flesh. I understand the the basis of their comments, and that yes, living in the flesh gets one in trouble. What's frustrating is when they look at me as if I have two heads when I try to explain that human flesh is part of the Trinity. They get riled and won't consider the "distinction" in what they are saying (which I agree with), and what you've said here (which is a different facet). So, while you may be, many don't seem to be open to "new insights." For me, I say that... part of being smart is knowing what I'm stupid at.
ReplyDeleteThe problem, I think, is that Paul often uses "flesh" differently than how evangelicals and Catholics use it.
ReplyDeleteFor Paul, flesh often refers to anything characterized by this present age (even Moses' law), and thus is an eschatological category; for evangelicals, flesh usually means anything physical or material (which is Gnostic); for Catholics, when they speak of Jesus ascending in the flesh, they mean in a glorified human body (with actual bones and stuff).
So taking the time to explain what you mean is key.
And after His ascension and upon the change of the priesthood; what was changed by adding one word to it?
ReplyDeleteI give up?
ReplyDelete